
First Focal Plane vs Second Focal Plane Scopes: Which Is Better?
, by Jack Scott, 8 min reading time

, by Jack Scott, 8 min reading time
If you’ve spent any time comparing rifle scopes, you’ve probably come across the terms First Focal Plane (FFP) and Second Focal Plane (SFP). It’s one of the biggest differences between modern variable-power scopes, but it’s also one of the most commonly misunderstood.
First Focal Plane (FFP) scopes have a reticle that changes size as you change magnification. This means MIL or MOA markings remain accurate throughout the magnification range, making FFP a strong choice for long-range shooting, target shooting and hunters who regularly use holdovers or wind corrections.
Second Focal Plane (SFP) scopes keep the reticle the same apparent size at every magnification. They are often a great choice for general hunting, where a clear, consistent reticle and simple aiming point are more important than using the reticle for ballistic corrections.
Simple rule: If you use the reticle as a measuring tool, choose FFP. If you mainly use the centre crosshair as an aiming point, SFP may be the better and simpler option.
If you’ve spent any time comparing rifle scopes, you’ve probably come across the terms First Focal Plane (FFP) and Second Focal Plane (SFP).
It’s one of the biggest differences between modern variable-power scopes, but it’s also one of the most commonly misunderstood.
So, does first focal plane mean better? Is second focal plane better for hunting? And does it really matter if you’re not shooting at extreme distances?
The answer comes down to how you use your scope.
Inside a variable-power rifle scope, the reticle can be positioned in one of two places in relation to the magnification system.
This gives us:
The easiest way to understand the difference is to look through the scope while changing magnification.
In a first focal plane scope, the reticle appears to grow larger as you increase magnification and become smaller as you decrease magnification.
More importantly, the reticle stays in proportion to the target.
That means the spacing between MOA or MIL markings continues to represent the same angular measurement regardless of the magnification setting.
This allows the shooter to use the reticle for:
throughout the magnification range.
Some recommended First Focal Plane scopes are:
In a second focal plane scope, the reticle appears to remain the same size as magnification changes.
The target becomes larger or smaller behind it, but the apparent size of the reticle stays constant.
The trade-off is that MOA, MIL and other ballistic markings generally correspond to their stated values only at a particular magnification setting nominated by the manufacturer.
Some recommended Second Focal Plane scopes are:
| Feature | First Focal Plane | Second Focal Plane |
|---|---|---|
| Reticle changes apparent size | Yes | No |
| Reticle subtensions stay consistent through magnification range | Yes | No |
| Good for reticle holdovers | Excellent | Good at calibrated magnification |
| Good for long-range shooting | Excellent | Good |
| Reticle visibility at low power | Can become fine | Remains consistent |
| Simple hunting reticles | Good | Excellent |
| Typical complexity | Higher | Lower |
| Best suited to | Long-range, target, competition and technical hunting | General hunting and straightforward aiming |
The biggest advantage of a first focal plane scope is consistent reticle subtension.
Imagine you are using a MIL-based reticle and your ballistic solution tells you to hold:
2.5 MIL high
and
0.8 MIL for wind
With an FFP scope, those measurements remain valid whether you are at moderate or high magnification.
This is especially useful when you need to change magnification quickly.
For example, you may locate a target at lower power, increase magnification once you are settled behind the rifle, and then use the reticle to make the required correction.
Because the reticle scales with the target, your MIL or MOA markings continue to represent their intended angular values.
This is one of the main reasons FFP scopes are so popular with long-range and precision shooters.
Think of looking at the same target through a 5–25x scope.
FFP:
Target: Small
Reticle: Small
SFP:
Target: Small
Reticle: Same apparent size
FFP:
Target: Medium
Reticle: Medium
SFP:
Target: Medium
Reticle: Same apparent size
FFP:
Target: Large
Reticle: Large
SFP:
Target: Large
Reticle: Same apparent size
The key difference is not simply that the FFP reticle becomes larger.
It is that the reticle and target magnify together.
That is what keeps the angular relationship between the reticle markings and the target consistent.
This is the main advantage.
If you have a properly designed MIL or MOA reticle, its markings retain their angular relationship with the target as magnification changes.
For shooters who regularly use holdovers rather than adjusting the elevation turret for every shot, this can be extremely useful.
Long-range shooting often involves:
FFP reticles are particularly well suited to these applications.
Modern scopes can incorporate sophisticated reticles with multiple elevation and windage references.
Some use a relatively simple MIL or MOA scale, while others feature a more detailed tree-style layout with multiple hold points.
An FFP design allows those references to remain useful at different magnification settings.
This makes FFP particularly attractive for:
Yes.
One of the main disadvantages is reticle visibility at low magnification.
Because an FFP reticle becomes smaller as magnification decreases, a detailed reticle that looks excellent at 20x may appear quite fine at 4x or 5x.
This can sometimes make the reticle harder to pick up quickly, particularly in darker conditions or against a busy background.
Some modern FFP scopes address this with:
At maximum magnification, the opposite can also happen.
A poorly designed FFP reticle may become visually heavy and potentially obscure a small target.
For that reason, reticle design is just as important as focal plane.
SFP scopes remain extremely popular, particularly for hunting.
And there is a good reason for that.
For many hunters, the advantages of an FFP reticle simply aren’t necessary.
If your normal shooting process is:
Then an SFP scope can work exceptionally well.
An SFP reticle looks essentially the same regardless of magnification.
For hunters, this can be particularly useful at low power.
A relatively bold hunting reticle remains easy to see when the magnification is turned down, rather than becoming progressively finer.
That can help when acquiring a target quickly or hunting in timber, scrub or other situations where lower magnification is useful.
Many hunters do not use their reticle to calculate elevation or windage.
They may sight the rifle in for a practical hunting distance and simply aim using the centre of the reticle for most shots.
For longer distances, they may dial elevation on the turret instead.
In that situation, the major advantage of FFP becomes much less important.
Traditional duplex and hunting reticles work particularly well in second focal plane scopes.
If your priority is a clean sight picture rather than a large number of ballistic references, SFP remains an excellent option.
This is probably the most important thing to understand about second focal plane scopes.
If your SFP reticle includes MOA or MIL markings, those markings are generally calibrated to provide their stated values at one particular magnification.
That magnification is determined by the manufacturer and should be confirmed in the scope’s manual.
For some scopes, the calibrated magnification may be maximum power, but you should never automatically assume that is the case.
For example, imagine an SFP scope with a reticle calibrated at 20x.
If your ballistic solution tells you to hold 3 MIL and you turn the scope down to 10x, simply using the same 3 MIL marking may no longer produce the intended angular correction.
With an FFP scope, the reticle scales with magnification, so the reticle subtensions remain consistent.
For Australian hunters, this is often where the decision becomes more practical.
Neither focal plane is automatically better.
It depends on the type of hunting you do and how much you rely on the reticle itself.
You regularly shoot at varying or extended distances and want to use the reticle for elevation and wind correction.
Subscribe to our emails